Personal tools

Eye Irritation

    1. ECVAM validated test methods
    2. Test methods under validation by ECVAM
    3. Development and optimization of alternative methods

 

 

Background


Eye irritation is the production of changes in the eye following the application of a test substance to the anterior surface of the eye, which are fully reversible within 21 days of application (OECD Test Guideline 405, in vivo). The EU has implemented the United Nations Globally Harmonized System (UN GHS) for the classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals with Directive 1272/2008 (EU CLP) (EC, 2008). The guidelines are provided in UN GHS (UN, 2009) and adopted in the EU CLP (EC, 2008). In brief, four representative in vivo endpoint(s) for final classification (corneal opacity, iritis, conjunctiva chemosis, conjunctiva redness) receive mean scores calculated following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours after installation of the test material to the eye sack of three different animals. The test material is classified as "Category 1" when at least in one animal the effects caused by the application of the test material are not expected to reverse, or have not fully reversed within an observation period of normally 21 days. Otherwise, if all effects have fully reversed within an observation period of normally 21 days, the test material is classified as "Category 2". UN GHS provides the option to distinguish "Category 2" test materials into two optional sub-categories (not implemented in EU CLP): ‘Category 2A’ (irritating to eyes) when the eye effects listed above are not fully reversible within 7 days of observation; ‘Category 2B’ (mildly irritating to eyes) when the eye effects listed above are fully reversible within 7 days of observation. Test materials that fall in none of the above two categories are not classified as eye irritants.

A number of OECD Test Guidelines based on in vitro methods related to the endpoint "Eye Irritation" already exist or are currently close to their final endorsement/update: 437, 438, 460. In addition, in Test Guideline 405 a stepwise testing strategy is described for the determination of the eye irritation/corrosion properties of substances. Using this strategy, as well as a weight-of-evidence analysis (where all available information on the eye irritation potential is considered prior to proceeding to in vivo testing) is important to avoid the unnecessary use of animals. Reducing substance testing resulting in severe animal responses promotes both animal welfare and sound science. Although TG 405 is an in vivo test method, it also supports the 3 Rs principle in reduction and refinement of animal testing.


 

Alternative test methods and approaches


1. ECVAM validated test methods

In the endpoint of eye irritation it is generally accepted that, in the foreseeable future, no single in vitro eye irritation test will be able to replace the in vivo Draize eye test to predict across the full range of irritation for different chemical classes. However, strategic combinations of several alternative test methods within a (tiered) testing strategy may be able to replace the Draize eye test. A possible conceptual framework for such a (tiered) testing strategy was developed within an ECVAM workshop (1). The framework is based on alternative eye irritation methods that vary in their capacity to detect either severe irritant substances (EU R41; GHS 'Category 1') or substances considered non-irritant (EU 'Non-Classified'; GHS 'No Category'). According to this framework, the entire range of irritancy may be resolved by arranging tests in a tiered strategy that may be operated from either end: to detect first severe irritants and resolve absence of irritancy ("Top-Down Approach") or to proceed inversely, starting with the identification of non-irritants first ("Bottom-Up Approach"). Mild irritancy will be resolved in a last tier in both approaches.

 

To evaluate the scientific validity of possible building blocks of such a test strategy and to assess their possible placement within a Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approach, several validation studies of different in vitro methods were undertaken or are ongoing:

  1. Organotypic in vitro assays:  Bovine Corneal Opacity & Permeability test (BCOP), Isolated Chicken Eye test (ICE), Isolated Rabbit Eye test (IRE), Hens Egg Test on the Chorio-Allantoic Membrane (HET-CAM).
  2. Cytotoxicity and cell function-based assays: Cytosensor Microphysiometer (CM), Fluorescein Leakage (FL), Neutral Red Release (NRR), Red Blood Cell test (RBC).

 

 

Reference

(1) Scott L, Eskes C, Hoffmann S, Adriaens E, Alepè N, Bufo M, Clothier R, Facchini D, Faller C, Guest R, Harbell J, Hartung T, Kamp H, Varlet BL, Meloni M, McNamee P, Osborne R, Pape W, Pfannenbecker U, Prinsen M, Seaman C, Spielmann H, Stokes W, Trouba K, Berghe CV, Goethem FV, Vassallo M, Vinardell P, Zuang V. A Proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approchaes"  Toxicol In Vitro, 2010, 24 (1), 1-9.


 

1.1 Organotypic in vitro assays

 

 

A retrospective validation study on four organotypic assays, i.e. the Bovine Corneal Opacity & Permeability test (BCOP), the Isolated Chicken Eye test (ICE), the Isolated Rabbit Eye test (IRE) and the Hens Egg Test on the Chorio-Allantoic Membrane (HET-CAM), was conducted between 2003 and 2006 by ICCVAM-NICEATM, with ECVAM collaboration, to assess the ability of these assays for detecting severe eye irritants and ocular corrosives. After peer review, two assays, the BCOP and ICE tests, were endorsed as scientifically valid to identify ocular corrosives and severe irritants in the US and EU (ICCVAM, 2006: ESAC, 2007). 

Test guidelines for these two test methods were adopted by OECD Council on 7th September, 2009.

With regard to the evaluation of the four organotypic assays for identifying mild or non irritants, a retrospective analysis of the collected data was conducted by ICCVAM. In May 2009, the ICCVAM Ocular Peer Review Panel recommended BCOP for the identification of non-classified materials (ICCVAM, 2009).

 

Table 1. Study documents pertaining to the retrospective validation study on organotypic in vitro assays for the prediction of eye irritation

Eye irritation tests

ESAC statement


Validation study documents and OECD Test Guidelines

 

Bovine Corneal Opacity and

Permeability (BCOP),
Isolated Chicken Eye (ICE)

test methods

pdf icon

  • ESAC Shadow Review Organotypic Eye Irritation Assays  pdf icon
  • Annex I. Guidance Document - ESAC Peer Review  pdf icon
  • Annex II. ECVAM Letter to ICCVAM - March 1, 2005  pdf icon
  • OECD Test Guidelines 437  pdf icon and 438  pdf icon         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Background Review Documents and the Test Method Evaluation Reports (TMER) are available on the ICCVAM web site.


 

1.2 Cytotoxicity and cell function-based assays

The retrospective validation study of four cytotoxicity and cell function-based assays, i.e. the Neutral Red Release (NRR), the Red Blood Cell test (RBC), the Fluorescein Leakage assay (FL) and the Cytosensor Microphysiometer (CM), took place between May 2006 and October 2008. The study was based on the retrospective collection of existing data compiled according to the ECVAM modular approach to validation and weight-of-evidence principles.

After peer review, two assays, the CM and the FL, were scientifically validated for being used as an initial step within a Top-Down approach to identify ocular corrosives and severe irritants from all other classes for the chemical applicability domain of water soluble chemicals (ESAC, 2009).

In addition, the CM was scientifically validated for being used as an initial step within a Bottom-Up approach useful to identify non-irritants from all other classes for water-soluble surfactants, and water-soluble surfactant-containing mixtures (ESAC, 2009).

 

Table 2. Study documents pertaining to the retrospective validation study on cytotoxicity/cell-function based in vitro assays for the prediction of eye irritation (2006-2009)

Eye irritation tests

ESAC statement

Validation study documents

 

Cytosensor Microphysiometer

(CM),

Fluorescein Leakage

(FL)

test methods

 

pdf icon

  • Guidance Document - ESAC Peer Review Panel  pdf icon
  • ESAC Peer Review Panel - consensus report  pdf icon
  • Recommendations from the Validation Management Group  pdf icon 
  • Comments from ECVAM on false negative substances  pdf icon 
  • Validation Management Group reply to the Peer Review Panel consensus report  pdf icon
  • Background Review Document for CM  pdf icon
  • Background Review Document for CM - Annexes  pdf icon
  • Background Review Document for FL pdf icon
  • Background Review Document for FL - Annexes  pdf icon 

  

















Table 3. Invittox protocols of the Cytosensor Microphysiometer (CM), Fluorescein Leakage (FL) test methods upon completion of the validation study

Test method

 Invittox Protocol

Cytosensor Microphysiometer (CM)

pdf icon

Fluorescein Leakage (FL)

pdf icon

 

 

 

 

 


NOTE

  • As soon as additional background documentation on the above methods become available for public access, they will be made available for download from this web page.
  • You can consult all available ESAC statements on validated methods and related matters: see ESAC Statements and Opinions.
     


2. Test methods under validation by EURL ECVAM


2.1 The two Reconstructed human Tissue (RhT)-based test methods: "SkinEthic Human Corneal Epithelium" and "EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test"

 

SkinEthic is based on 3D constructs prepared from immortalized human corneal epithelial cells while EpiOcular uses a 3D construct prepared from non-transformed, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes. These construct tissues are used to test, under different conditions, chemicals for the assessment of ocular toxicity. They are both advanced in vitro methods currently undergoing validation by EURL ECVAM (2). Notably, EURL ECVAM and COLIPA are jointly sponsoring an EURL ECVAM‑co‑ordinated full prospective validation study on two reconstructed tissue models. 

Although these assays appear to be promising for specific purposes and applicability domains, they may not fully address the relevant mechanisms of ocular toxicity. Some examples include the reversibility of effects due to tissue remodelling following inflammation. 

To achieve full replacement of the animal test, the use of tiered test strategies has been recommended, which exploit the strengths of particular in vitro assays, in order to address the required ranges of irritation potential, chemical classes and/or mechanisms of action. 

In 2010 ECVAM has, together with external experts, published a simple approach of aligning test methods in a strategic manner. This so‑called bottom‑up/top‑down approach describes how to use specific eye irritation test methods for either identifying serious eye irritants from the rest of the chemicals or for identifying non‑irritants (i.e., chemicals that do not require classification) from the rest of the population (3). ECVAM is promoting this approach as means of a testing strategy using various in vitro methods which may in their totality and if used in this strategic manner allow replacing the Draize animal test. It was moreover recommended to advance the development of mechanistically‑based models, in order to address the currently existing mechanistic gaps (3).

The ICCVAM/ECVAM symposium on Mechanisms of Chemically-Induced Ocular Injury and Recovery, held in May 2005, identified the following aspects of ocular irritation where further investigation and development would be helpful:

  • the assessment of depth of injury as potential indicator of irreversibility/reversibility of effects (4);
  • the use of complex human models (e.g., 3D human corneal tissue reconstructs); and
  • the use of inflammatory mediators (e.g., cytokines, adhesion proteins) as potential markers and predictors of ocular irritation.

In addition, investigation of the potential effects on the ocular nervous system could be of value. Such an endpoint is not always identifiable in the animal test, although it is important to avoid pain and discomfort during clinical trials and to the end consumer. In addition, it might be possible to gain an insight into the neurogenic components of inflammation, which could contribute to the general chemically-induced inflammatory response of the cornea (5).

Currently, the COLIPA eye irritation research programme addresses some of the above mentioned mechanistic features, by supporting the development of mechanistically based assays, such as 3D human reconstructs and the assessment of inflammatory mediators and toxicogenomics as biomarkers to predict eye irritation. In addition, various isolated efforts exist within the scientific community addressing the same endpoints. EURL ECVAM is following such efforts, to ensure that the most mechanistically relevant assays proceed toward validation according to internationally agreed principles, and eventually lead, most likely in combination with other assays, to the full replacement of specific animal tests, in particular the Draize-test (6).

In July 2009, ESAC endorsed the CM (INVITTOX Protocol 102 modified) as scientifically valid for use as an initial step within a top-down approach to identify ocular corrosives and severe irritants (GHS Cat 1, EU R41, EPA Cat I) from all other classes, for water-soluble chemicals (substances and mixtures). Furthermore, the CM (INVITTOX Protocol 102 modified) was considered to have been scientifically validated for use as an initial step within a bottom-up approach to identify chemicals not classified as irritants (GHS no category, EU no category, 19 EPA Cat IV) from all irritant classes, only for water-soluble surfactants, and water-soluble surfactant containing mixtures (ESAC, 2009c).

Regarding the remaining two of the four organotypic assays, the Hen’s Egg Test on the Chorio-allantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) assay and the Isolated Rabbit Eye (IRE) test, they were evaluated by ESAC who requested that further work was to be performed before a statement on their scientific validity to identify ocular corrosives and severe irritants could be made.


References

(2) Eskes C, Bessou S, Bruner L et al. Subchapter 3.3. Eye Irritation. In: Eskes C, Zuang V, eds. Alternative (nonanimal) Methods for Cosmetics Testing: Current Status and Future Prospects. Altern Lab Anim—ATLA 2005; 33(Suppl 1):4781.

(3) Scott L, Eskes C, Hoffmann S et al. A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using BottomUp and TopDown approaches. Toxicol In Vitro 2010; 24(1):19.

(4) Maurer JK, Parker RD, Jester JV. Extent of initial corneal injury as the mechanistic basis for ocular irritation: key findings and recommendations for the development of alternative assays. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2002; 36:106117.

(5) Garle MJ, Fry JR. Sensory nerves, neurogenic inflammation and pain: missing components of alternative irritation strategies? A review and a potential strategy. Altern Lab Anim—ATLA 2003; 31(3):295316.

(6) Bouvier d’Yvoire M. et al., (2012) Chapter 10: ECVAM and new technologies for toxicity testing. In New Technologies for Toxicity Testing, edited by Michael Balls, Robert D. Combes and Nirmala Bhogal. ©2012 Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media. (ISBN: 978-1-4614-3054-4).




2.2 In vivo refinement test method

 

Low Volume Eye Test (LVET)

 

The retrospective validation study of the refinement/reduction Low Volume Eye Test (LVET) method for the use domain of household detergents and cleaning products as well as their main ingredient classes took place between 2006 and 2009.

After peer review, the LVET was not recommended for prospective use, i.e. to generate new data but it was recommended that existing LVET data of the limited use domain of household detergents and cleaning products as well as their main ingredient classes may be used for purposes of classification and labeling decisions. Moreover, it was recommended that existing LVET data of this limited use domain may be used as supplementary data for future validation studies. No additional testing should be however performed to further develop or validate the LVET test (ESAC, 2009).

 

 

Table 4. Study documents pertaining to the retrospective validation study on LVET (2006-2009).

Eye irritation test

 ESAC Statement

Low Volume Eye Test (LVET)

pdf icon

 

 

 

 

 


ECVAM template for in vivo eye irritation classification of chemicals with existing Draize data to assist the development, optimisation and validation of alternative test methods or strategies

The Excel template and accompanying explanatory document available for download below were developed at ECVAM. The template includes built-in algorithms for calculating eye irritation classifications from Draize in vivo eye irritation data, according to the rules of the classification systems of the European Union Dangerous Substances Directive (EU DSD), the European Union Regulation on Classification, Labelling and Packaging (EU CLP), the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (UN GHS) and of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). The explanatory document provides detailed instructions on how to use the template.  ECVAM strongly recommends the use of this template to generate eye irritation classifications from existing reference Draize in vivo data for chemicals that shall be used in the development, optimisation and validation of alternative test methods or strategies for eye irritation.

 

Table 5. ECVAM template and explanatory document for in vivo eye irritation classification.

ECVAM template for in vivo eye irritation classification (revised version - May 2013)

excel icon

    Explanatory document on the use of the ECVAM template (revised version - May 2013)

pdf icon

 

 

 

  


Scientifically Validated Methods


Cytotoxicity/cell-function based in vitro assays (Cytosensor Microphysiometer INVITTOX Protocol 130 (102 modified), Fluorescein Leakage INVITTOX Protocol 71) for eye irritation testing


Date of the ESAC statement: 10 July 2009

Remarks: The ESAC statement is based on a retrospective data analysis. The tests are to be used within a tiered testing strategy as described in the statement.

Related Documents:



Regulatory Acceptance

  • Isolated Chicken Eye (ICE) test method

Regulation:

ESAC Statement:

    • 27 April 2007: The ESAC Statement is based on the U.S. ICCVAM retrospective study

Remarks:

    • Partial replacement of the in vivo rabbit eye irritation test. The OECD TG 438 recommends ICE for the use as part of a tierd-testing strategy for regulatory classification and labelling within a specific applicability domain. However, test substances can be classified as ocular corrosives or severe irritants under certain circumstances and with specific limitations without further testing in rabbits. A substance that tests negative would need to be tested in rabbits using a sequential testing strategy as outlined in OECD TG 405 corresponding to the Method B.5 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008.

      See also:

 

  • The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test methods (BCOP)

Regulation:

ESAC Statement:

    • 27 April 2007: The ESAC Statement is based on the U.S. ICCVAM retrospective study

Remarks:

    • Partial replacement of the in vivo rabbit eye irritation test. The OECD TG 437 recommends BCOP for the use as part of a tierd-testing strategy for regulatory classification and labelling within a specific applicability domain. However, test substances can be classified as ocular corrosives or severe irritants under certain circumstances and with specific limitations without further testing in rabbits. A substance that tests negative would need to be tested in rabbits using a sequential testing strategy as outlined in OECD TG 405 corresponding to the Method B.5 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008.


See also:

  



Having been occasionally the lead organisation for the drafting and regulatory acceptance of several Test Guidelines (405 (in vivo), 437, 438, 460, draft TG on Cytosensor Microphysiometer) on in vitro eye irritation, EURL ECVAM is continuing activities in collaboration with the OECD test guidelines programme in view of improving the scientific use of in vitro eye irritation test methods and their standardisation.

Document Actions
Watch our video!

Scientists from EURL ECVAM show you what they are doing to advance safety assessment of chemicals without relying on animal testingdefault frame updated video

Transcript also available:pdf icon EN; FR; DE; IT.

Version updated June 2014.

 

Tag Cloud

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.

Dynamic site map

site map screenshot